Sayyid Husain Al-Musawi: A Journey from Shi'ism to Sunni Islam

Sayyid Husain Al-Musawi was a prominent Shiite scholar who made a significant and controversial transition from Shi'ism to Sunni Islam. His journey is documented in his book, Lillah Thumma Li at-Tarikh (For Allah, Then for History), where he outlines the reasons for his conversion and the theological and doctrinal issues he encountered within Shi'ism.

Early Life and Education

Born in Karbala, Iraq, Sayyid Husain Al-Musawi hailed from a distinguished Shiite lineage. He pursued Islamic studies in the renowned seminaries of Najaf, Iraq, where he achieved the status of mujtahid, a high-ranking scholar qualified to issue legal opinions. His education was grounded in the classical Shiite curriculum, and he was deeply immersed in the theological and jurisprudential traditions of Shi'ism.

Theological Dilemmas and Initial Doubts

Despite his esteemed position within the Shiite community, Al-Musawi began to experience internal conflicts regarding certain Shiite beliefs and practices. He found inconsistencies and contradictions within the Shiite texts, particularly concerning the status and infallibility of the Twelve Imams. These theological issues led him to question the foundations of Shi'ism.

In his book, Al-Musawi recounts how he sought clarification from senior Shiite scholars. However, instead of providing satisfactory answers, many of these scholars dismissed his concerns, labeling them as doubts stemming from insufficient knowledge. This lack of meaningful dialogue further fueled his skepticism.

Deepening Research and Exposure to Sunni Perspectives

Determined to find the truth, Al-Musawi embarked on an extensive study of Islamic texts from both Shiite and Sunni traditions. He delved into the Qur'an, Hadith collections, and historical accounts, comparing interpretations and narratives. Through this comparative study, he discovered what he perceived as distortions and misrepresentations within Shi'ism, particularly regarding the early Islamic history and the companions of the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him).

Al-Musawi was particularly struck by the Sunni emphasis on the unity of the Muslim community and the respect for the Prophet's companions. He found the Sunni perspective more aligned with the teachings of the Qur'an and the authentic traditions of the Prophet.

Public Declaration and Repercussions

In 1990, Al-Musawi publicly declared his conversion to Sunni Islam. He openly criticized the Shiite doctrines and practices that he had once upheld, advocating for a return to what he considered the authentic teachings of Islam. His declaration was met with severe backlash from the Shiite community.

Al-Musawi faced threats to his life and was labeled a heretic and apostate. Despite the dangers, he remained steadfast in his beliefs, emphasizing the importance of seeking the truth and adhering to the Qur'an and authentic Sunnah.

Legacy and Impact

Sayyid Husain Al-Musawi's journey from Shi'ism to Sunni Islam has had a lasting impact on the discourse between the two sects. His book, Lillah Thumma Li at-Tarikh, serves as a personal testimony and a scholarly critique of Shi'ism from within. It has been translated into various languages and continues to be a reference for those seeking to understand the reasons behind his conversion.

Al-Musawi's story highlights the complexities and challenges faced by individuals navigating sectarian divides within Islam. It underscores the importance of critical inquiry, open dialogue, and the pursuit of knowledge in the quest for religious truth.

Conclusion

Sayyid Husain Al-Musawi's transition from Shi'ism to Sunni Islam is a profound example of personal conviction and intellectual courage. His journey reflects the broader challenges within Islamic thought and the ongoing quest for authenticity and truth. While his conversion remains a contentious topic, it undeniably contributes to the rich tapestry of Islamic scholarship and inter-sectarian dialogue.

"Mengapa Aku Keluar Dari Syi'ah" -- Sayyid Husain Al-Musawi

Sayyid Husain Al-Musawi adalah seorang ulama besar Syi’ah yang lahir di Karbala, Iraq. Beliau menuntut ilmu di Hauzah Ilmiah Najaf dan dianugerahkan gelar mujtahid oleh Sayyid Muhammad Husain Ali Kasyif al-Ghita. Namun, setelah melalui proses refleksi dan kajian mendalam, beliau memutuskan untuk meninggalkan ajaran Syi’ah dan kembali kepada Ahlus Sunnah Wal Jamaah. Keputusan ini beliau tuliskan dalam bukunya yang berjudul Lillahi Tsumma Littarih (Lillah kemudian untuk sejarah), yang diterjemahkan ke dalam Bahasa Melayu dengan judul Mengapa Aku Keluar Dari Syi’ah.

---

1. Kecelaruan dalam Kitab-Kitab Muktabar Syi’ah

Semasa menuntut ilmu di Hauzah, Sayyid Husain sering merasa bingung dengan percanggahan yang terdapat dalam kitab-kitab muktabar Syi’ah. Beliau cuba menenangkan hati dengan beranggapan bahawa kekeliruan tersebut disebabkan oleh kurangnya pemahaman beliau. Namun, semakin mendalam pengajian beliau, semakin banyak permasalahan timbul, dan semakin kuat perasaan ragu dalam jiwa beliau. Akhirnya, beliau memutuskan untuk melakukan kajian komprehensif dan mengkaji semula seluruh materi pelajaran yang pernah beliau terima. Beliau membaca segala referensi yang ada, baik yang muktabar mahupun tidak, dan menulis segala kebingungan atau percanggahan yang beliau temui dalam lembaran-lembaran kertas, berharap suatu hari Allah menetapkan keputusan untuk beliau.

---

2. Penemuan Fakta Sejarah yang Mengejutkan

Dalam kajian beliau, Sayyid Husain menemui fakta-fakta sejarah yang mengejutkan. Beliau mengetahui bahawa Abdullah bin Saba’, seorang Yahudi, dianggap sebagai pengasas aliran Syi’ah yang memecahbelahkan kaum Muslimin dan menimbulkan permusuhan sesama mereka. Beliau juga mengetahui apa yang telah dilakukan oleh nenek moyang kita (ahli Kufah) terhadap Ahlul Bait Rasulullah dan segala apa yang tercatat dalam kitab-kitab kita mengenai kutukan dan celaan para Imam kepada mereka. Ahlul Bait juga merasa tidak senang kepada mereka. Beliau juga mengetahui bahawa mereka mendustakan Allah dengan mengatakan bahawa Al-Qur’an telah diselewengkan, sedangkan Allah telah memberi jaminan untuk memeliharanya. Beliau merasa terkejut dan kecewa dengan penemuan ini, yang semakin menguatkan keputusan beliau untuk meninggalkan ajaran Syi’ah. Goodreads

---

3. Amalan-Amanan yang Bertentangan dengan Syariat Islam

Sayyid Husain juga mendapati bahawa terdapat amalan-amalan dalam Syi’ah yang bertentangan dengan syariat Islam. Salah satu contohnya adalah amalan nikah mut’ah, yang dibenarkan dalam Syi’ah tetapi diharamkan dalam Islam. Beliau juga mendapati bahawa terdapat riwayat-riwayat palsu yang dimasukkan ke dalam kitab-kitab Syi’ah, yang mengandungi caci maki dan penghinaan terhadap Ahlus Sunnah. Beliau merasa bahawa amalan-amalan dan riwayat-riwayat tersebut tidak mencerminkan ajaran Islam yang sebenar dan semakin memperkuatkan keputusan beliau untuk meninggalkan Syi’ah.

---

4. Fatwa dan Ancaman terhadap Beliau

Keputusan Sayyid Husain untuk meninggalkan Syi’ah tidak diterima dengan baik oleh pihak-pihak tertentu dalam komuniti Syi’ah. Beliau menerima fatwa dari Hauzah yang menyatakan bahawa beliau telah sesat dan bukunya Lillahi Tsumma Littarih menyesatkan. Beliau juga diancam dengan hukuman mati sebagai orang yang murtad dari agama. Namun, beliau tidak gentar dan tetap bertekad untuk menyampaikan kebenaran walaupun menghadapi risiko tersebut.

---

5. Keputusan untuk Kembali kepada Ahlus Sunnah Wal Jamaah

Setelah melalui proses kajian dan refleksi yang mendalam, Sayyid Husain memutuskan untuk kembali kepada Ahlus Sunnah Wal Jamaah. Beliau menyedari bahawa ajaran Syi’ah yang selama ini beliau anuti tidak mencerminkan ajaran Islam yang sebenar dan penuh dengan penyimpangan. Beliau berharap agar keputusan beliau ini dapat membuka mata umat Islam yang lain untuk menilai semula pegangan mereka dan kembali kepada ajaran Islam yang sebenar. HafizFirdaus.com

---

6. Pesan untuk Umat Islam

Sayyid Husain menegaskan bahawa keputusan beliau untuk meninggalkan Syi’ah bukanlah keputusan yang mudah, tetapi merupakan keputusan yang diambil setelah melalui proses kajian dan refleksi yang mendalam. Beliau berharap agar umat Islam dapat menilai semula ajaran-ajaran yang mereka anuti dan memastikan bahawa ia selaras dengan ajaran Islam yang sebenar. Beliau juga menekankan pentingnya mencari kebenaran dan tidak terpengaruh dengan ajaran-ajaran yang tidak jelas sumbernya.

---

Kesimpulan

Perjalanan intelektual dan spiritual Sayyid Husain Al-Musawi menggambarkan pencarian kebenaran yang tulus dan berani. Keputusan beliau untuk meninggalkan ajaran Syi’ah dan kembali kepada Ahlus Sunnah Wal Jamaah adalah hasil dari kajian yang mendalam dan refleksi yang panjang. Buku beliau, Mengapa Aku Keluar Dari Syi’ah, merupakan sumbangan penting dalam memahami perbezaan antara ajaran Syi’ah dan Ahlus Sunnah serta pentingnya kembali kepada ajaran Islam yang sebenar.

Who is Seyyed Hossein Nasr?

Seyyed Hossein Nasr is one of the most influential Muslim scholars, philosophers, and intellectuals of the modern era. A profound voice in the fields of Islamic philosophy, Sufism, science, and traditional metaphysics, Nasr has spent over six decades promoting a deeply spiritual, intellectually rigorous vision of Islam and its compatibility with perennial wisdom and the sacred sciences.

Often described as a bridge between the traditional Islamic worldview and the modern West, Nasr’s work has helped articulate a coherent response to modernity from within the heart of Islamic intellectual and spiritual traditions. His writings—spanning more than 60 books and hundreds of articles—have had a lasting impact on academic, religious, and philosophical discourse across the world.

---

Early Life and Education

Seyyed Hossein Nasr was born on April 7, 1933, in Tehran, Iran, into a highly educated and aristocratic family with close ties to the royal court and deep intellectual roots. His father, Seyyed Valiallah Nasr, was a physician and intellectual who exposed him early to both Persian culture and Western ideas.

Nasr was a gifted student and left Iran at the age of 12 to attend school in the United States. He enrolled at The Peddie School in New Jersey and later studied at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), earning a degree in physics in 1954. But even as he pursued the sciences, his heart was drawn toward philosophy and metaphysics.

He completed his Ph.D. at Harvard University in 1958, focusing on the history of science and Islamic cosmology. His dissertation, which became the foundation for his landmark book Science and Civilization in Islam, examined how classical Islamic science was rooted in a sacred worldview—something he saw lacking in the modern scientific paradigm.

---

Intellectual Foundations: Tradition, Perennial Philosophy, and Islam

At the core of Nasr’s intellectual vision is the idea of Tradition—not simply as inherited customs, but as divinely revealed truths that shape the spiritual and intellectual life of civilizations. Deeply influenced by the Traditionalist School—especially René Guénon and Frithjof Schuon—Nasr believes in the Perennial Philosophy (philosophia perennis), which posits that all major world religions share a common metaphysical core.

For Nasr, Islam is one of the most complete and intact expressions of this perennial truth. He advocates for a return to the spiritual, intellectual, and metaphysical foundations of Islamic civilization, as expressed through philosophy (falsafa), Sufism (tasawwuf), sacred art, and science rooted in divine principles.

---

Contributions to the Study of Islamic Science

One of Nasr’s most significant intellectual contributions is in the field of Islamic science. In contrast to the view that Islamic science is merely a historical phase of empirical discovery, Nasr argues that it is a sacred science—a way of understanding the universe as a reflection of divine reality.

In his influential book Science and Civilization in Islam, and later works such as The Encounter of Man and Nature and Islamic Science: An Illustrated Study, Nasr shows how traditional Islamic science—astronomy, medicine, cosmology, alchemy—was rooted in metaphysical principles and symbolic understanding of the cosmos.

He sharply critiques modern science for being spiritually barren and detached from any higher meaning. Rather than rejecting science itself, Nasr calls for a re-sacralization of knowledge, in which science serves not only practical ends but also guides humanity toward wisdom and inner realization.

---

A Voice of Islam in the Modern World

As a traditionalist Muslim, Nasr has often positioned himself as a critic of both Western secularism and Islamic fundamentalism. He believes the former strips life of spiritual depth, while the latter represents a reactionary and often shallow interpretation of Islamic teachings.

His writings emphasize the inner dimension of Islam, especially Sufism, as the heart of the Islamic spiritual life. For Nasr, Islam is not just a legal or political system—it is a holistic, sacred worldview that includes theology, art, philosophy, ethics, and inner purification.

Among his many books addressing the modern condition and Islamic spirituality are:

• Knowledge and the Sacred

• The Heart of Islam: Enduring Values for Humanity

• Islamic Life and Thought

• Religion and the Order of Nature

In these works, Nasr presents a deeply intellectual, aesthetically rich, and spiritually elevated vision of Islam—one that offers guidance not only to Muslims, but to anyone seeking wisdom in an increasingly disenchanted world.

---

Academic Career and Influence

Nasr spent much of his early academic life teaching in Iran. He became the youngest university dean in the country’s history when he was appointed President of Aryamehr University (now Sharif University of Technology). He also served as a professor at the University of Tehran and was instrumental in establishing the Imperial Iranian Academy of Philosophy in the 1970s.

Following the 1979 Iranian Revolution, Nasr went into exile in the United States, where he became a professor of Islamic Studies at Temple University. Since 1984, he has taught at The George Washington University in Washington, D.C., where he is University Professor of Islamic Studies.

His influence extends across disciplines—Islamic studies, religious philosophy, environmental ethics, history of science, and metaphysics. He has mentored generations of scholars and participated in interfaith dialogues, helping foster understanding between Islam and the West.

---

Environmental Thought

Nasr is also regarded as a pioneer of Islamic environmentalism. Long before ecology became a global concern, he warned about the consequences of a desacralized, materialistic worldview on the natural world. In Man and Nature: The Spiritual Crisis of Modern Man, he argues that the environmental crisis is at heart a spiritual crisis, and only a return to a sacred view of nature can restore balance.

For Nasr, nature is not just a resource but a divine sign (ayah)—a reflection of the transcendent order. This perspective has inspired ecological thinkers, Muslim and non-Muslim alike, to approach environmental issues from an ethical and spiritual perspective.

---

Legacy and Criticism

Seyyed Hossein Nasr’s legacy is vast and complex. He is admired for:

• Reintroducing classical Islamic philosophy and Sufism to modern audiences.

• Building bridges between Islamic and Western thought.

• Reviving traditional sciences and sacred cosmologies.

• Articulating a spiritually coherent critique of modernity.

However, he has also faced criticism, particularly from:

• Modernist Muslims, who see his traditionalism as rigid or outdated.

• Fundamentalists, who reject Sufism and metaphysical interpretations of Islam.

• Secular academics, who may view his embrace of metaphysics as non-rigorous by contemporary scholarly standards.

Despite this, his intellectual integrity, eloquence, and spiritual depth have earned him wide respect across ideological lines.

---

Conclusion

Seyyed Hossein Nasr stands as a towering figure in contemporary Islamic thought—a philosopher who has dared to swim against the currents of modernity, while never turning away from its questions. Whether through his writings on Islamic philosophy, sacred science, Sufism, or environmental ethics, Nasr has consistently called for a return to wisdom, beauty, and the sacred as the foundations of life.

In a fragmented, fast-paced world, his voice reminds us of a deeper truth: that knowledge is not just for utility, but for the soul—and that, ultimately, the goal of knowledge is to know the Divine.

Muhammad Ali Jinnah, the Man who founded Pakistan, was a Twelver Shiite

Muhammad Ali Jinnah, known as the founder of Pakistan and revered as Quaid-e-Azam (the Great Leader), played a pivotal role in the creation of a separate nation for Muslims in South Asia. His political acumen, legal expertise, and steadfast leadership transformed him into a symbol of Muslim unity and nationalism. However, his religious identity has been a subject of debate and speculation, particularly concerning whether he was a Twelver Shia Muslim.

---

Early Life and Religious Background

Born as Mahomedali Jinnahbhai on December 25, 1876, in Karachi, Jinnah hailed from a Khoja family of Ismaili Shia Muslim origin. The Khojas are a sect within the Nizari Ismaili branch of Shia Islam. Jinnah's early religious affiliations were rooted in this community. However, in 1901, he distanced himself from the Ismaili sect, a move that has led to various interpretations of his subsequent religious identity. Wikipedia

---

Transition to Twelver Shia Islam

After his departure from the Ismaili community, Jinnah's religious practices and affiliations became more aligned with the Twelver Shia tradition. This transition is documented through personal accounts and legal records. For instance, in 1936, Jinnah married Ruttie Bai, a Parsi woman, in a ceremony conducted according to Shia rites, with Jinnah represented by a Shia scholar. Furthermore, during his funeral in 1948, Shia rituals were observed, and prominent Shia figures were present, indicating his adherence to Twelver Shia practices.

---

Public Stance on Sectarian Identity

Despite his personal religious practices, Jinnah maintained a public stance of religious neutrality. He often responded to questions about his sect by stating, "Was Muhammad the Prophet a Shia or a Sunni?" This rhetorical question underscored his belief in a unified Muslim identity that transcended sectarian divisions. His approach was reflective of his broader vision for Pakistan as a homeland for Muslims, irrespective of their sectarian affiliations.

---

Legal Proceedings and Religious Identity

The question of Jinnah's religious identity was brought to the forefront during legal proceedings after his death. In 1948, his sister, Fatima Jinnah, filed a petition in the Sindh High Court to have his will executed under Shia inheritance law, describing him as a "Shia Khoja Mohamedan." This affidavit was supported by Prime Minister Liaquat Ali Khan. However, in 1970, a legal challenge was raised by Hussain Ali Ganji Walji, who claimed Jinnah had converted to Sunni Islam. The court rejected this claim in 1976, effectively acknowledging Jinnah's Shia identity. Yet, in 1984, a high court bench reversed this decision, stating that Jinnah was "definitely not a Shia," suggesting he was Sunni. This legal back-and-forth reflects the complexities and ambiguities surrounding Jinnah's religious identity.

---

Jinnah's Legacy and Religious Identity

Regardless of his personal religious beliefs, Jinnah's legacy is characterized by his advocacy for a secular state where religious identity would not define citizenship or rights. His vision for Pakistan was one where Muslims of all sects could coexist peacefully, and where the state would not impose religious orthodoxy. This inclusive approach has been a cornerstone of Pakistan's founding principles.

---

Conclusion

Muhammad Ali Jinnah's religious identity, particularly his affiliation with Twelver Shia Islam, has been a topic of historical inquiry and debate. While personal and legal records suggest his alignment with the Twelver Shia tradition, Jinnah's public life was marked by a commitment to religious unity and secular governance. His ability to navigate and transcend sectarian divisions in both his personal and political life underscores his vision for a pluralistic and inclusive Pakistan.

What did Imam Malik Ibn Anas say about Shiites?

Imam Malik ibn Anas, a foundational figure in Islamic jurisprudence and the founder of the Maliki school of thought, is often regarded as a bridge between early Islamic scholarship and the later Sunni tradition. His views on various theological and jurisprudential matters have been subjects of extensive study. Among the areas of interest is his stance towards the Shiite community, particularly the followers of Imam Ali and his descendants.

Imam Malik's Relationship with Imam Ja'far al-Sadiq

One of the most notable aspects of Imam Malik's interactions with the Shiite community is his relationship with Imam Ja'far al-Sadiq, the sixth Shia Imam. Historical records indicate that Imam Malik studied under Imam Ja'far al-Sadiq in Medina. Imam Malik is reported to have spoken highly of Imam Ja'far, describing him as "among the pious scholars who fear Allah" . This acknowledgment highlights a mutual respect between the two scholars, despite their differing theological orientations.

Furthermore, Imam Malik's Muwatta, one of the earliest and most respected collections of hadith and Islamic jurisprudence, includes narrations from Imam Ja'far al-Sadiq. This inclusion signifies a recognition of Imam Ja'far's scholarly contributions and his standing within the broader Islamic scholarly community.

Imam Malik's Views on the Companions of the Prophet

Imam Malik's perspectives on the companions of the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) also provide insight into his stance towards the Shiite community. It is documented that Imam Malik held the first three caliphs—Abu Bakr, Umar, and Uthman—in high regard, considering them to be the rightful successors of the Prophet. This view aligns with the Sunni tradition, which generally recognizes the legitimacy of these caliphs.

However, Imam Malik's emphasis on the companions did not extend to a blanket endorsement of all their actions. For instance, he reportedly criticized certain companions for their conduct during specific events, indicating a nuanced approach to their legacy. This balanced perspective suggests that while Imam Malik upheld the status of the companions, he was not uncritical of their actions, a stance that resonates with the Shiite emphasis on justice and accountability.

Imam Malik's Jurisprudential Approach

In his jurisprudential methodology, Imam Malik emphasized the practices of the people of Medina as a primary source of legal precedent. This approach was grounded in the belief that the practices of the Medinan community reflected the traditions of the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) and his companions. While this methodology was widely accepted in Sunni jurisprudence, it sometimes led to differences with other Islamic traditions, including the Shiite school of thought, which places significant emphasis on the teachings and practices of the Ahl al-Bayt (the Prophet's family).

Despite these differences, Imam Malik's jurisprudential works were studied and respected by scholars across the Islamic world, including those from the Shiite tradition. His emphasis on the importance of scholarly inquiry and adherence to the principles of Islamic law found common ground with the Shiite commitment to rigorous scholarship and the pursuit of justice.

Imam Malik's Legacy and the Shiite Perspective

From a Shiite perspective, Imam Malik is often viewed as a respected scholar who, despite theological differences, contributed significantly to Islamic jurisprudence. His recognition of Imam Ja'far al-Sadiq's scholarship and his nuanced views on the companions of the Prophet are seen as indicative of a scholarly approach that valued knowledge and justice over sectarian divisions.

However, differences in theological beliefs, particularly regarding the succession of leadership after the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH), remain points of divergence between the Sunni and Shiite traditions. While Imam Malik upheld the legitimacy of the first three caliphs, the Shiite tradition holds that leadership should have remained within the Prophet's family, specifically with Imam Ali and his descendants.

Conclusion

Imam Malik ibn Anas's views on the Shiite community reflect a complex interplay of respect, scholarly engagement, and theological divergence. His acknowledgment of Imam Ja'far al-Sadiq's scholarship and his balanced perspectives on the companions of the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) indicate a commitment to knowledge and justice. While differences in theological beliefs persist, Imam Malik's legacy continues to be a subject of study and respect across both Sunni and Shiite traditions.