Who is Yasser Al-Habib?

Yasser Al-Habib is a controversial Shia cleric and media figure known for his outspoken views on Islamic history and his provocative interpretations of religious texts. Born in Kuwait to an Iranian-descended family, Al-Habib's early education included both secular studies and traditional Islamic sciences under the guidance of Ayatollah Mohammed Reza Shirazi. His career has been marked by legal troubles, exile, and the establishment of media platforms that have garnered both support and criticism. memri.org+1ebnhussein.com+1howold.co

---

Early Life and Education

Al-Habib was raised in a religious Kuwaiti family of Iranian descent. He began his education in Kuwaiti government schools before attending Kuwait University, where he graduated from the Faculty of Political Sciences. In addition to his secular education, Al-Habib pursued traditional Islamic studies under the mentorship of Ayatollah Mohammed Reza Shirazi, a prominent Shia scholar. howold.co

---

Founding of The Mahdi Servants Organization

In 1999, Al-Habib founded The Mahdi Servants Organization in Kuwait, aiming to establish a "Rafida global voice and movement" and to revive the Rafida Shia faith. The organization's mission was to cultivate a future generation of Shia Muslims who were courageous in promoting their beliefs and proficient in communication and propagation. However, the organization's activities attracted the attention of Kuwaiti authorities, leading to calls for its suspension by members of the Kuwaiti National Assembly. 5pillarsuk.com

---

Legal Troubles and Exile

Al-Habib's outspoken views on Islamic history led to legal troubles in Kuwait. In 2004, he was sentenced to one year in prison for "questioning the conduct and integrity of some of the companions of the Prophet Muhammad" during a lecture he delivered. The lecture, which was reportedly delivered in a closed environment, relied heavily on Wahhabi references and angered hardline Wahhabi groups. Al-Habib was reportedly subjected to several orchestrated violent attacks in prison by Wahhabi inmates. ifex.org+2ifex.org+2howold.co+2

After serving part of his sentence, Al-Habib fled Kuwait, first to Iraq and then to Iran. In 2005, he moved to the United Kingdom, where he was granted asylum. In London, he re-established The Mahdi Servants Organization and launched Fadak TV in 2010, aiming to provide a platform for Shia perspectives and to reach a global audience. howold.co5pillarsuk.com+1howold.co+1

---

Controversial Views and Statements

Al-Habib is known for his controversial views on Islamic history, particularly regarding certain companions of the Prophet Muhammad. He has made inflammatory statements about figures such as Abu Bakr, Umar ibn al-Khattab, and Aisha, the wife of the Prophet. For instance, in a 2008 lecture, he claimed that Umar ibn al-Khattab wished he had been feces, a statement that sparked outrage among Sunni Muslims. memri.org

In 2014, Al-Habib further provoked tensions by stating that to eliminate ISIS, Muslims must "do away with Abu Bakr, Omar, and 'Aisha," suggesting that these figures were the roots of modern terrorism. His remarks were broadcast on Fadak TV and led to investigations by UK authorities for allegedly stirring sectarian tensions. memri.orghowold.co+3english.alarabiya.net+3memri.org+3

---

Media Influence and "The Lady of Heaven"

Through Fadak TV, Al-Habib has produced and distributed content that reflects his interpretations of Islamic history. One of the most notable projects is the film The Lady of Heaven, which portrays the life of Fatimah, the daughter of the Prophet Muhammad, and includes depictions of early Islamic figures. The film has been met with criticism from various Muslim communities, particularly Sunni groups, who view it as a distortion of Islamic history and an affront to revered figures. 5pillarsuk.com+15pillarsuk.com+1

---

Plans for an Islamic State

In recent years, Al-Habib has expressed intentions to establish an Islamic state in the United Kingdom. Reports indicate that he has been in talks to purchase Torsa Island in Scotland, with plans to develop it into an Islamic community governed by Sharia law. The project has reportedly raised significant funds from supporters worldwide. However, the feasibility and legality of such plans remain uncertain, and they have attracted criticism from various quarters. thenewswizard.com

---

Conclusion

Yasser Al-Habib is a polarizing figure within the Muslim world. His advocacy for a particular interpretation of Shia Islam, coupled with his controversial statements and plans for an Islamic state, have made him a subject of significant debate. While he has garnered support from certain segments of the Shia community, his views have also led to widespread criticism and concern among both Sunni Muslims and broader society. Al-Habib's activities continue to spark discussions about religious tolerance, sectarianism, and the boundaries of free speech within the Islamic world.

Sayyid Husain Al-Musawi: A Journey from Shi'ism to Sunni Islam

Sayyid Husain Al-Musawi was a prominent Shiite scholar who made a significant and controversial transition from Shi'ism to Sunni Islam. His journey is documented in his book, Lillah Thumma Li at-Tarikh (For Allah, Then for History), where he outlines the reasons for his conversion and the theological and doctrinal issues he encountered within Shi'ism.

Early Life and Education

Born in Karbala, Iraq, Sayyid Husain Al-Musawi hailed from a distinguished Shiite lineage. He pursued Islamic studies in the renowned seminaries of Najaf, Iraq, where he achieved the status of mujtahid, a high-ranking scholar qualified to issue legal opinions. His education was grounded in the classical Shiite curriculum, and he was deeply immersed in the theological and jurisprudential traditions of Shi'ism.

Theological Dilemmas and Initial Doubts

Despite his esteemed position within the Shiite community, Al-Musawi began to experience internal conflicts regarding certain Shiite beliefs and practices. He found inconsistencies and contradictions within the Shiite texts, particularly concerning the status and infallibility of the Twelve Imams. These theological issues led him to question the foundations of Shi'ism.

In his book, Al-Musawi recounts how he sought clarification from senior Shiite scholars. However, instead of providing satisfactory answers, many of these scholars dismissed his concerns, labeling them as doubts stemming from insufficient knowledge. This lack of meaningful dialogue further fueled his skepticism.

Deepening Research and Exposure to Sunni Perspectives

Determined to find the truth, Al-Musawi embarked on an extensive study of Islamic texts from both Shiite and Sunni traditions. He delved into the Qur'an, Hadith collections, and historical accounts, comparing interpretations and narratives. Through this comparative study, he discovered what he perceived as distortions and misrepresentations within Shi'ism, particularly regarding the early Islamic history and the companions of the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him).

Al-Musawi was particularly struck by the Sunni emphasis on the unity of the Muslim community and the respect for the Prophet's companions. He found the Sunni perspective more aligned with the teachings of the Qur'an and the authentic traditions of the Prophet.

Public Declaration and Repercussions

In 1990, Al-Musawi publicly declared his conversion to Sunni Islam. He openly criticized the Shiite doctrines and practices that he had once upheld, advocating for a return to what he considered the authentic teachings of Islam. His declaration was met with severe backlash from the Shiite community.

Al-Musawi faced threats to his life and was labeled a heretic and apostate. Despite the dangers, he remained steadfast in his beliefs, emphasizing the importance of seeking the truth and adhering to the Qur'an and authentic Sunnah.

Legacy and Impact

Sayyid Husain Al-Musawi's journey from Shi'ism to Sunni Islam has had a lasting impact on the discourse between the two sects. His book, Lillah Thumma Li at-Tarikh, serves as a personal testimony and a scholarly critique of Shi'ism from within. It has been translated into various languages and continues to be a reference for those seeking to understand the reasons behind his conversion.

Al-Musawi's story highlights the complexities and challenges faced by individuals navigating sectarian divides within Islam. It underscores the importance of critical inquiry, open dialogue, and the pursuit of knowledge in the quest for religious truth.

Conclusion

Sayyid Husain Al-Musawi's transition from Shi'ism to Sunni Islam is a profound example of personal conviction and intellectual courage. His journey reflects the broader challenges within Islamic thought and the ongoing quest for authenticity and truth. While his conversion remains a contentious topic, it undeniably contributes to the rich tapestry of Islamic scholarship and inter-sectarian dialogue.

"Mengapa Aku Keluar Dari Syi'ah" -- Sayyid Husain Al-Musawi

Sayyid Husain Al-Musawi adalah seorang ulama besar Syi’ah yang lahir di Karbala, Iraq. Beliau menuntut ilmu di Hauzah Ilmiah Najaf dan dianugerahkan gelar mujtahid oleh Sayyid Muhammad Husain Ali Kasyif al-Ghita. Namun, setelah melalui proses refleksi dan kajian mendalam, beliau memutuskan untuk meninggalkan ajaran Syi’ah dan kembali kepada Ahlus Sunnah Wal Jamaah. Keputusan ini beliau tuliskan dalam bukunya yang berjudul Lillahi Tsumma Littarih (Lillah kemudian untuk sejarah), yang diterjemahkan ke dalam Bahasa Melayu dengan judul Mengapa Aku Keluar Dari Syi’ah.

---

1. Kecelaruan dalam Kitab-Kitab Muktabar Syi’ah

Semasa menuntut ilmu di Hauzah, Sayyid Husain sering merasa bingung dengan percanggahan yang terdapat dalam kitab-kitab muktabar Syi’ah. Beliau cuba menenangkan hati dengan beranggapan bahawa kekeliruan tersebut disebabkan oleh kurangnya pemahaman beliau. Namun, semakin mendalam pengajian beliau, semakin banyak permasalahan timbul, dan semakin kuat perasaan ragu dalam jiwa beliau. Akhirnya, beliau memutuskan untuk melakukan kajian komprehensif dan mengkaji semula seluruh materi pelajaran yang pernah beliau terima. Beliau membaca segala referensi yang ada, baik yang muktabar mahupun tidak, dan menulis segala kebingungan atau percanggahan yang beliau temui dalam lembaran-lembaran kertas, berharap suatu hari Allah menetapkan keputusan untuk beliau.

---

2. Penemuan Fakta Sejarah yang Mengejutkan

Dalam kajian beliau, Sayyid Husain menemui fakta-fakta sejarah yang mengejutkan. Beliau mengetahui bahawa Abdullah bin Saba’, seorang Yahudi, dianggap sebagai pengasas aliran Syi’ah yang memecahbelahkan kaum Muslimin dan menimbulkan permusuhan sesama mereka. Beliau juga mengetahui apa yang telah dilakukan oleh nenek moyang kita (ahli Kufah) terhadap Ahlul Bait Rasulullah dan segala apa yang tercatat dalam kitab-kitab kita mengenai kutukan dan celaan para Imam kepada mereka. Ahlul Bait juga merasa tidak senang kepada mereka. Beliau juga mengetahui bahawa mereka mendustakan Allah dengan mengatakan bahawa Al-Qur’an telah diselewengkan, sedangkan Allah telah memberi jaminan untuk memeliharanya. Beliau merasa terkejut dan kecewa dengan penemuan ini, yang semakin menguatkan keputusan beliau untuk meninggalkan ajaran Syi’ah. Goodreads

---

3. Amalan-Amanan yang Bertentangan dengan Syariat Islam

Sayyid Husain juga mendapati bahawa terdapat amalan-amalan dalam Syi’ah yang bertentangan dengan syariat Islam. Salah satu contohnya adalah amalan nikah mut’ah, yang dibenarkan dalam Syi’ah tetapi diharamkan dalam Islam. Beliau juga mendapati bahawa terdapat riwayat-riwayat palsu yang dimasukkan ke dalam kitab-kitab Syi’ah, yang mengandungi caci maki dan penghinaan terhadap Ahlus Sunnah. Beliau merasa bahawa amalan-amalan dan riwayat-riwayat tersebut tidak mencerminkan ajaran Islam yang sebenar dan semakin memperkuatkan keputusan beliau untuk meninggalkan Syi’ah.

---

4. Fatwa dan Ancaman terhadap Beliau

Keputusan Sayyid Husain untuk meninggalkan Syi’ah tidak diterima dengan baik oleh pihak-pihak tertentu dalam komuniti Syi’ah. Beliau menerima fatwa dari Hauzah yang menyatakan bahawa beliau telah sesat dan bukunya Lillahi Tsumma Littarih menyesatkan. Beliau juga diancam dengan hukuman mati sebagai orang yang murtad dari agama. Namun, beliau tidak gentar dan tetap bertekad untuk menyampaikan kebenaran walaupun menghadapi risiko tersebut.

---

5. Keputusan untuk Kembali kepada Ahlus Sunnah Wal Jamaah

Setelah melalui proses kajian dan refleksi yang mendalam, Sayyid Husain memutuskan untuk kembali kepada Ahlus Sunnah Wal Jamaah. Beliau menyedari bahawa ajaran Syi’ah yang selama ini beliau anuti tidak mencerminkan ajaran Islam yang sebenar dan penuh dengan penyimpangan. Beliau berharap agar keputusan beliau ini dapat membuka mata umat Islam yang lain untuk menilai semula pegangan mereka dan kembali kepada ajaran Islam yang sebenar. HafizFirdaus.com

---

6. Pesan untuk Umat Islam

Sayyid Husain menegaskan bahawa keputusan beliau untuk meninggalkan Syi’ah bukanlah keputusan yang mudah, tetapi merupakan keputusan yang diambil setelah melalui proses kajian dan refleksi yang mendalam. Beliau berharap agar umat Islam dapat menilai semula ajaran-ajaran yang mereka anuti dan memastikan bahawa ia selaras dengan ajaran Islam yang sebenar. Beliau juga menekankan pentingnya mencari kebenaran dan tidak terpengaruh dengan ajaran-ajaran yang tidak jelas sumbernya.

---

Kesimpulan

Perjalanan intelektual dan spiritual Sayyid Husain Al-Musawi menggambarkan pencarian kebenaran yang tulus dan berani. Keputusan beliau untuk meninggalkan ajaran Syi’ah dan kembali kepada Ahlus Sunnah Wal Jamaah adalah hasil dari kajian yang mendalam dan refleksi yang panjang. Buku beliau, Mengapa Aku Keluar Dari Syi’ah, merupakan sumbangan penting dalam memahami perbezaan antara ajaran Syi’ah dan Ahlus Sunnah serta pentingnya kembali kepada ajaran Islam yang sebenar.

Who is Seyyed Hossein Nasr?

Seyyed Hossein Nasr is one of the most influential Muslim scholars, philosophers, and intellectuals of the modern era. A profound voice in the fields of Islamic philosophy, Sufism, science, and traditional metaphysics, Nasr has spent over six decades promoting a deeply spiritual, intellectually rigorous vision of Islam and its compatibility with perennial wisdom and the sacred sciences.

Often described as a bridge between the traditional Islamic worldview and the modern West, Nasr’s work has helped articulate a coherent response to modernity from within the heart of Islamic intellectual and spiritual traditions. His writings—spanning more than 60 books and hundreds of articles—have had a lasting impact on academic, religious, and philosophical discourse across the world.

---

Early Life and Education

Seyyed Hossein Nasr was born on April 7, 1933, in Tehran, Iran, into a highly educated and aristocratic family with close ties to the royal court and deep intellectual roots. His father, Seyyed Valiallah Nasr, was a physician and intellectual who exposed him early to both Persian culture and Western ideas.

Nasr was a gifted student and left Iran at the age of 12 to attend school in the United States. He enrolled at The Peddie School in New Jersey and later studied at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), earning a degree in physics in 1954. But even as he pursued the sciences, his heart was drawn toward philosophy and metaphysics.

He completed his Ph.D. at Harvard University in 1958, focusing on the history of science and Islamic cosmology. His dissertation, which became the foundation for his landmark book Science and Civilization in Islam, examined how classical Islamic science was rooted in a sacred worldview—something he saw lacking in the modern scientific paradigm.

---

Intellectual Foundations: Tradition, Perennial Philosophy, and Islam

At the core of Nasr’s intellectual vision is the idea of Tradition—not simply as inherited customs, but as divinely revealed truths that shape the spiritual and intellectual life of civilizations. Deeply influenced by the Traditionalist School—especially René Guénon and Frithjof Schuon—Nasr believes in the Perennial Philosophy (philosophia perennis), which posits that all major world religions share a common metaphysical core.

For Nasr, Islam is one of the most complete and intact expressions of this perennial truth. He advocates for a return to the spiritual, intellectual, and metaphysical foundations of Islamic civilization, as expressed through philosophy (falsafa), Sufism (tasawwuf), sacred art, and science rooted in divine principles.

---

Contributions to the Study of Islamic Science

One of Nasr’s most significant intellectual contributions is in the field of Islamic science. In contrast to the view that Islamic science is merely a historical phase of empirical discovery, Nasr argues that it is a sacred science—a way of understanding the universe as a reflection of divine reality.

In his influential book Science and Civilization in Islam, and later works such as The Encounter of Man and Nature and Islamic Science: An Illustrated Study, Nasr shows how traditional Islamic science—astronomy, medicine, cosmology, alchemy—was rooted in metaphysical principles and symbolic understanding of the cosmos.

He sharply critiques modern science for being spiritually barren and detached from any higher meaning. Rather than rejecting science itself, Nasr calls for a re-sacralization of knowledge, in which science serves not only practical ends but also guides humanity toward wisdom and inner realization.

---

A Voice of Islam in the Modern World

As a traditionalist Muslim, Nasr has often positioned himself as a critic of both Western secularism and Islamic fundamentalism. He believes the former strips life of spiritual depth, while the latter represents a reactionary and often shallow interpretation of Islamic teachings.

His writings emphasize the inner dimension of Islam, especially Sufism, as the heart of the Islamic spiritual life. For Nasr, Islam is not just a legal or political system—it is a holistic, sacred worldview that includes theology, art, philosophy, ethics, and inner purification.

Among his many books addressing the modern condition and Islamic spirituality are:

• Knowledge and the Sacred

• The Heart of Islam: Enduring Values for Humanity

• Islamic Life and Thought

• Religion and the Order of Nature

In these works, Nasr presents a deeply intellectual, aesthetically rich, and spiritually elevated vision of Islam—one that offers guidance not only to Muslims, but to anyone seeking wisdom in an increasingly disenchanted world.

---

Academic Career and Influence

Nasr spent much of his early academic life teaching in Iran. He became the youngest university dean in the country’s history when he was appointed President of Aryamehr University (now Sharif University of Technology). He also served as a professor at the University of Tehran and was instrumental in establishing the Imperial Iranian Academy of Philosophy in the 1970s.

Following the 1979 Iranian Revolution, Nasr went into exile in the United States, where he became a professor of Islamic Studies at Temple University. Since 1984, he has taught at The George Washington University in Washington, D.C., where he is University Professor of Islamic Studies.

His influence extends across disciplines—Islamic studies, religious philosophy, environmental ethics, history of science, and metaphysics. He has mentored generations of scholars and participated in interfaith dialogues, helping foster understanding between Islam and the West.

---

Environmental Thought

Nasr is also regarded as a pioneer of Islamic environmentalism. Long before ecology became a global concern, he warned about the consequences of a desacralized, materialistic worldview on the natural world. In Man and Nature: The Spiritual Crisis of Modern Man, he argues that the environmental crisis is at heart a spiritual crisis, and only a return to a sacred view of nature can restore balance.

For Nasr, nature is not just a resource but a divine sign (ayah)—a reflection of the transcendent order. This perspective has inspired ecological thinkers, Muslim and non-Muslim alike, to approach environmental issues from an ethical and spiritual perspective.

---

Legacy and Criticism

Seyyed Hossein Nasr’s legacy is vast and complex. He is admired for:

• Reintroducing classical Islamic philosophy and Sufism to modern audiences.

• Building bridges between Islamic and Western thought.

• Reviving traditional sciences and sacred cosmologies.

• Articulating a spiritually coherent critique of modernity.

However, he has also faced criticism, particularly from:

• Modernist Muslims, who see his traditionalism as rigid or outdated.

• Fundamentalists, who reject Sufism and metaphysical interpretations of Islam.

• Secular academics, who may view his embrace of metaphysics as non-rigorous by contemporary scholarly standards.

Despite this, his intellectual integrity, eloquence, and spiritual depth have earned him wide respect across ideological lines.

---

Conclusion

Seyyed Hossein Nasr stands as a towering figure in contemporary Islamic thought—a philosopher who has dared to swim against the currents of modernity, while never turning away from its questions. Whether through his writings on Islamic philosophy, sacred science, Sufism, or environmental ethics, Nasr has consistently called for a return to wisdom, beauty, and the sacred as the foundations of life.

In a fragmented, fast-paced world, his voice reminds us of a deeper truth: that knowledge is not just for utility, but for the soul—and that, ultimately, the goal of knowledge is to know the Divine.

Muhammad Ali Jinnah, the Man who founded Pakistan, was a Twelver Shiite

Muhammad Ali Jinnah, known as the founder of Pakistan and revered as Quaid-e-Azam (the Great Leader), played a pivotal role in the creation of a separate nation for Muslims in South Asia. His political acumen, legal expertise, and steadfast leadership transformed him into a symbol of Muslim unity and nationalism. However, his religious identity has been a subject of debate and speculation, particularly concerning whether he was a Twelver Shia Muslim.

---

Early Life and Religious Background

Born as Mahomedali Jinnahbhai on December 25, 1876, in Karachi, Jinnah hailed from a Khoja family of Ismaili Shia Muslim origin. The Khojas are a sect within the Nizari Ismaili branch of Shia Islam. Jinnah's early religious affiliations were rooted in this community. However, in 1901, he distanced himself from the Ismaili sect, a move that has led to various interpretations of his subsequent religious identity. Wikipedia

---

Transition to Twelver Shia Islam

After his departure from the Ismaili community, Jinnah's religious practices and affiliations became more aligned with the Twelver Shia tradition. This transition is documented through personal accounts and legal records. For instance, in 1936, Jinnah married Ruttie Bai, a Parsi woman, in a ceremony conducted according to Shia rites, with Jinnah represented by a Shia scholar. Furthermore, during his funeral in 1948, Shia rituals were observed, and prominent Shia figures were present, indicating his adherence to Twelver Shia practices.

---

Public Stance on Sectarian Identity

Despite his personal religious practices, Jinnah maintained a public stance of religious neutrality. He often responded to questions about his sect by stating, "Was Muhammad the Prophet a Shia or a Sunni?" This rhetorical question underscored his belief in a unified Muslim identity that transcended sectarian divisions. His approach was reflective of his broader vision for Pakistan as a homeland for Muslims, irrespective of their sectarian affiliations.

---

Legal Proceedings and Religious Identity

The question of Jinnah's religious identity was brought to the forefront during legal proceedings after his death. In 1948, his sister, Fatima Jinnah, filed a petition in the Sindh High Court to have his will executed under Shia inheritance law, describing him as a "Shia Khoja Mohamedan." This affidavit was supported by Prime Minister Liaquat Ali Khan. However, in 1970, a legal challenge was raised by Hussain Ali Ganji Walji, who claimed Jinnah had converted to Sunni Islam. The court rejected this claim in 1976, effectively acknowledging Jinnah's Shia identity. Yet, in 1984, a high court bench reversed this decision, stating that Jinnah was "definitely not a Shia," suggesting he was Sunni. This legal back-and-forth reflects the complexities and ambiguities surrounding Jinnah's religious identity.

---

Jinnah's Legacy and Religious Identity

Regardless of his personal religious beliefs, Jinnah's legacy is characterized by his advocacy for a secular state where religious identity would not define citizenship or rights. His vision for Pakistan was one where Muslims of all sects could coexist peacefully, and where the state would not impose religious orthodoxy. This inclusive approach has been a cornerstone of Pakistan's founding principles.

---

Conclusion

Muhammad Ali Jinnah's religious identity, particularly his affiliation with Twelver Shia Islam, has been a topic of historical inquiry and debate. While personal and legal records suggest his alignment with the Twelver Shia tradition, Jinnah's public life was marked by a commitment to religious unity and secular governance. His ability to navigate and transcend sectarian divisions in both his personal and political life underscores his vision for a pluralistic and inclusive Pakistan.

What did Imam Malik Ibn Anas say about Shiites?

Imam Malik ibn Anas, a foundational figure in Islamic jurisprudence and the founder of the Maliki school of thought, is often regarded as a bridge between early Islamic scholarship and the later Sunni tradition. His views on various theological and jurisprudential matters have been subjects of extensive study. Among the areas of interest is his stance towards the Shiite community, particularly the followers of Imam Ali and his descendants.

Imam Malik's Relationship with Imam Ja'far al-Sadiq

One of the most notable aspects of Imam Malik's interactions with the Shiite community is his relationship with Imam Ja'far al-Sadiq, the sixth Shia Imam. Historical records indicate that Imam Malik studied under Imam Ja'far al-Sadiq in Medina. Imam Malik is reported to have spoken highly of Imam Ja'far, describing him as "among the pious scholars who fear Allah" . This acknowledgment highlights a mutual respect between the two scholars, despite their differing theological orientations.

Furthermore, Imam Malik's Muwatta, one of the earliest and most respected collections of hadith and Islamic jurisprudence, includes narrations from Imam Ja'far al-Sadiq. This inclusion signifies a recognition of Imam Ja'far's scholarly contributions and his standing within the broader Islamic scholarly community.

Imam Malik's Views on the Companions of the Prophet

Imam Malik's perspectives on the companions of the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) also provide insight into his stance towards the Shiite community. It is documented that Imam Malik held the first three caliphs—Abu Bakr, Umar, and Uthman—in high regard, considering them to be the rightful successors of the Prophet. This view aligns with the Sunni tradition, which generally recognizes the legitimacy of these caliphs.

However, Imam Malik's emphasis on the companions did not extend to a blanket endorsement of all their actions. For instance, he reportedly criticized certain companions for their conduct during specific events, indicating a nuanced approach to their legacy. This balanced perspective suggests that while Imam Malik upheld the status of the companions, he was not uncritical of their actions, a stance that resonates with the Shiite emphasis on justice and accountability.

Imam Malik's Jurisprudential Approach

In his jurisprudential methodology, Imam Malik emphasized the practices of the people of Medina as a primary source of legal precedent. This approach was grounded in the belief that the practices of the Medinan community reflected the traditions of the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) and his companions. While this methodology was widely accepted in Sunni jurisprudence, it sometimes led to differences with other Islamic traditions, including the Shiite school of thought, which places significant emphasis on the teachings and practices of the Ahl al-Bayt (the Prophet's family).

Despite these differences, Imam Malik's jurisprudential works were studied and respected by scholars across the Islamic world, including those from the Shiite tradition. His emphasis on the importance of scholarly inquiry and adherence to the principles of Islamic law found common ground with the Shiite commitment to rigorous scholarship and the pursuit of justice.

Imam Malik's Legacy and the Shiite Perspective

From a Shiite perspective, Imam Malik is often viewed as a respected scholar who, despite theological differences, contributed significantly to Islamic jurisprudence. His recognition of Imam Ja'far al-Sadiq's scholarship and his nuanced views on the companions of the Prophet are seen as indicative of a scholarly approach that valued knowledge and justice over sectarian divisions.

However, differences in theological beliefs, particularly regarding the succession of leadership after the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH), remain points of divergence between the Sunni and Shiite traditions. While Imam Malik upheld the legitimacy of the first three caliphs, the Shiite tradition holds that leadership should have remained within the Prophet's family, specifically with Imam Ali and his descendants.

Conclusion

Imam Malik ibn Anas's views on the Shiite community reflect a complex interplay of respect, scholarly engagement, and theological divergence. His acknowledgment of Imam Ja'far al-Sadiq's scholarship and his balanced perspectives on the companions of the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) indicate a commitment to knowledge and justice. While differences in theological beliefs persist, Imam Malik's legacy continues to be a subject of study and respect across both Sunni and Shiite traditions.

Fatawa of Muslim Scholars on Khomeini: A Critical Perspective

The legacy of Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, the architect of the 1979 Iranian Revolution and the founder of the Islamic Republic of Iran, remains a subject of intense debate among Muslim scholars worldwide. His political and theological innovations, particularly the doctrine of Wilayat al-Faqih (Guardianship of the Islamic Jurist), have elicited a spectrum of responses—from staunch support within Iran to vehement opposition from various Islamic scholars and institutions globally. This article delves into the critical fatwas (Islamic legal opinions) issued by prominent Muslim scholars regarding Khomeini's ideologies and actions, examining the theological and political dimensions of their objections.

1. The Doctrine of Wilayat al-Faqih

At the heart of Khomeini's political philosophy lies the concept of Wilayat al-Faqih, which posits that a qualified Islamic jurist should hold supreme authority over the state in the absence of the infallible Imam. Khomeini's assertion that this jurist could wield both religious and political power was revolutionary and controversial. Critics argue that this doctrine deviates from traditional Islamic governance, where political authority is not concentrated in the hands of a single jurist. The implementation of this theory led to the establishment of a theocratic regime in Iran, consolidating power under the Supreme Leader and sidelining other religious authorities.

2. Theological Controversies and Blasphemous Claims

Several of Khomeini's statements have been deemed blasphemous by his critics. Notably, he claimed that all prophets, including Prophet Muhammad, had failed to establish justice, a task he attributed to the awaited Mahdi. Such assertions challenge the fundamental Islamic belief in the infallibility and success of the prophets' missions. Additionally, Khomeini's elevation of the Shiite Imams above all angels and messengers contradicts mainstream Islamic teachings, which uphold the unique status of the prophets.

3. Fatwas Condemning Khomeini

In response to Khomeini's controversial views, numerous Islamic scholars issued fatwas condemning his ideologies:

• Grand Ayatollah Shariatmadari: A leading Shiite cleric, Shariatmadari opposed Khomeini's doctrine of Wilayat al-Faqih, advocating for a more consultative form of governance. His dissent led to significant political repression, including threats to his life and the suppression of his followers.

• Grand Mufti of Saudi Arabia, Shaykh Muhammad ibn Ibrahim: He issued a fatwa declaring Khomeini's ideas as heretical and a deviation from authentic Islam, emphasizing the importance of adhering to traditional Islamic jurisprudence.

• International Union of Muslim Scholars (IUMS): This organization, representing Sunni scholars worldwide, has consistently criticized Khomeini's political theories, viewing them as innovations (bid'ah) that undermine the Islamic principle of consultation (shura) in governance.

4. The Fatwa Against Salman Rushdie

In 1989, Khomeini issued a fatwa calling for the death of British author Salman Rushdie, following the publication of his novel The Satanic Verses, which Khomeini deemed blasphemous. This fatwa sparked widespread international condemnation and highlighted the tension between freedom of expression and religious sensitivities. While some clerics supported Khomeini's decree, many scholars, including Ayatollah Montazeri, Khomeini's former successor, criticized the fatwa, arguing that it contradicted Islamic principles of justice and due process.

5. Legacy and Ongoing Debates

The theological and political implications of Khomeini's doctrines continue to influence Islamic thought. His supporters view him as a reformer who sought to revive Islamic governance, while his detractors see him as a figure who introduced divisive innovations into Islamic tradition. The ongoing debates reflect the broader struggle within the Muslim world between traditionalist and reformist interpretations of Islam.

6. Conclusion

The fatwas condemning Khomeini's ideologies underscore a significant rift within the Muslim scholarly community regarding the intersection of religion and politics. While Khomeini's supporters argue that his theories offer a path to an Islamic state, critics contend that his innovations have led to theological deviations and political authoritarianism. The diverse perspectives on Khomeini's legacy highlight the complexities of interpreting Islamic principles in the modern world and the enduring quest for a governance model that aligns with Islamic values.

---

References:

• "Fataawaa of Muslim Scholars on Khomeini" – Islaam.org.uk

• "Fataawaa of Muslim Scholars on Khomeini" – SunnahOnline.com

• "Ayatollah Khomeini Never Read Salman Rushdie's Book" – The New Yorker

• "A Fundamental Fight" – Vanity Fair

• "Rushdie Fatwa" – Wired

• "Hussein-Ali Montazeri" – Wikipedia

• "Mohammad Sadeq Rouhani" – Wikipedia

• "Mohammad Fazel Lankarani" – Wikipedia

Imam Al-Albani's Stance on Ayatollah Khomeini: A Scholarly Perspective

Introduction

The discourse surrounding the religious standing of Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, the founder of the Islamic Republic of Iran, has been a subject of significant debate among Islamic scholars. One prominent figure in this discussion is Imam Muhammad Nasiruddin al-Albani, a renowned 20th-century Islamic scholar known for his contributions to hadith sciences and his firm stance on Islamic creed. Imam al-Albani's views on Khomeini's theological positions have been a point of contention, particularly concerning accusations of heresy and disbelief.

Imam Al-Albani's Critique of Khomeini

Imam al-Albani's critical perspective on Khomeini stems from the latter's theological assertions, which al-Albani deemed to be in direct contradiction with core Islamic principles. A significant point of contention was Khomeini's elevation of the Shiite Imams to a status superior to that of the Prophets and Messengers. In his book Islamic Government, Khomeini states:

"The Imam has a praised station, a supreme rank, and universal sovereignty to which authority and command submit all the atoms of this universe. And of the imperatives of our religion is that our Imams occupy a praised station which is accessible by neither a close angel nor a sent prophet..."

Imam al-Albani viewed such statements as clear indications of heresy, as they attribute divine-like qualities to human figures, thereby undermining the exclusive sovereignty of Allah.

Theological Implications of Khomeini's Views

Khomeini's assertion that the teachings of the Imams are equivalent to the teachings of the Quran further compounded the concerns raised by Imam al-Albani. He claimed that the teachings of the Imams are timeless and applicable to all generations, a stance that al-Albani and other scholars considered to be a form of idolatry. By equating human teachings with the divine revelation of the Quran, Khomeini's views were seen as a direct challenge to the fundamental tenet of monotheism in Islam.

Al-Albani's Fatwa on Khomeini

In response to these theological deviations, Imam al-Albani issued a fatwa declaring Khomeini's beliefs as kufr (disbelief). He argued that Khomeini's views were not merely doctrinal differences but represented a fundamental departure from the core beliefs of Islam. Imam al-Albani emphasized that such beliefs, if held sincerely, place an individual outside the fold of Islam, regardless of outward religious practices.

The Role of Takfir in Islamic Jurisprudence

The concept of takfir, declaring someone a disbeliever, is a serious matter in Islamic jurisprudence. Imam al-Albani's declaration was not made lightly; it was based on a thorough examination of Khomeini's writings and public statements. According to al-Albani, the act of declaring someone a disbeliever is justified when their beliefs contradict essential Islamic doctrines, such as the oneness of Allah and the finality of the Prophethood of Muhammad (PBUH).

Scholarly Consensus and Divergence

While Imam al-Albani's fatwa reflects a stringent interpretation of Islamic creed, it is important to note that not all scholars agree with his assessment. Some argue that Khomeini's views were influenced by his Shiite background and should be understood within that context. Others contend that Khomeini's political actions and leadership should be evaluated separately from his theological beliefs.

Conclusion

Imam al-Albani's stance on Ayatollah Khomeini highlights the complexities and sensitivities involved in Islamic theological discourse. His fatwa serves as a reminder of the importance of adhering to the core principles of Islam and the necessity of scholarly vigilance in safeguarding the faith from beliefs that may lead to its distortion. As with all theological matters, it is crucial for scholars and followers alike to approach such issues with knowledge, understanding, and respect for the diversity of interpretations within the Islamic tradition.

What did Ibn Taimiyyah say about Shiites?

Among the towering figures of medieval Islamic scholarship, Ahmad ibn Taymiyyah (1263–1328 CE) stands out as a theologian, jurist, and polemicist whose writings have had a lasting influence on Islamic thought—particularly within Sunni Islam. While his contributions to Islamic jurisprudence, theology, and reform movements are widely recognized, one of the more controversial and discussed aspects of his legacy is his critique of Shiism.

Ibn Taymiyyah lived during a time of great political fragmentation and theological debate. His views on the Shiites, especially the Twelver (Imami) and Ismaili sects, were shaped by both doctrinal disagreement and the socio-political realities of his time. His writings, especially in works like Minhāj al-Sunnah al-Nabawiyyah, reflect a harsh polemic against Shiite doctrines and practices, which he saw as diverging significantly from what he believed to be the authentic teachings of Islam.

Historical Context: Sectarian Tensions

To understand Ibn Taymiyyah’s stance on the Shiites, it is important to appreciate the historical context in which he lived. The Islamic world in the 13th and 14th centuries was marked by Mongol invasions, the fall of the Abbasid Caliphate in Baghdad (1258), and the rise of various dynasties with differing religious affiliations. Shiite groups had established political authority in several regions, most notably the Fatimids (Ismailis) in Egypt and the Buyids (Twelvers) in Persia.

Additionally, Ibn Taymiyyah was deeply influenced by the political threat of the Mongol rulers, many of whom claimed to be Muslim but were seen by Ibn Taymiyyah as not implementing Islamic law properly. Some Shiite scholars and groups were aligned with or supported the Mongols, which further shaped his suspicion and condemnation of Shiism as both a religious and political deviation from Sunni orthodoxy.

Minhāj al-Sunnah: Ibn Taymiyyah’s Major Refutation of Shiism

Ibn Taymiyyah’s most comprehensive work on Shiism is Minhāj al-Sunnah al-Nabawiyyah (The Way of the Prophetic Sunnah), written as a rebuttal to the Shiite scholar al-‘Allāmah al-Hilli and his book Minhāj al-Karāmah. This treatise systematically critiques Shiite theology, history, and methodology. The work is extensive and touches on a wide range of issues, from the concept of Imamate to the status of the Prophet’s companions.

1. Rejection of the Imamate Doctrine

Central to Shiite theology is the belief in the Imamate—that leadership after the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) was divinely designated for Ali ibn Abi Talib and his descendants. Ibn Taymiyyah strongly rejected this notion, arguing that it had no basis in the Qur’an or authentic Sunnah. He maintained that the leadership of Abu Bakr, Umar, and Uthman was legitimate and rightly guided.

He saw the Shiite insistence on Ali’s exclusive right to rule as a political innovation (bid‘ah) that later evolved into a theological doctrine. To Ibn Taymiyyah, the early Muslim community accepted the caliphate of Abu Bakr and the other caliphs through consensus (ijmā‘), which he considered a core principle of Sunni legitimacy.

2. Defense of the Companions

Ibn Taymiyyah vigorously defended the integrity and righteousness of the Sahabah (companions of the Prophet), whom Shiite narratives often criticized—especially figures like Abu Bakr, Umar, and Aisha. In contrast to Shiite traditions that portrayed some companions as usurpers or hypocrites, Ibn Taymiyyah held that all the companions should be honored and respected, citing numerous Qur'anic verses in their favor.

He considered reviling the companions to be not only a moral offense but also a theological error that undermined the transmission of Islamic knowledge and the foundations of Islamic law. In his view, without trust in the companions, the credibility of the Sunnah collapses.

3. Criticism of Shiite Hadith Sources

Ibn Taymiyyah was highly skeptical of Shiite hadith collections, such as those found in Al-Kāfī by Al-Kulayni. He criticized the methods of transmission and the reliability of narrators in Shiite chains of narration (isnāds). According to him, many of the hadiths used to support Shiite beliefs were either fabricated or weak, especially those that elevate the status of the Imams to near-prophetic levels.

In Minhāj al-Sunnah, he also challenges the Shiite notion of the Infallibility (‘Ismah) of the Imams, arguing that only the Prophet was divinely protected from error, and to claim such purity for others was both un-Islamic and unsupported by revelation.

4. Rituals and Innovations

Ibn Taymiyyah took issue with certain Shiite religious practices, such as the commemoration of Ashura, the self-flagellation rituals, and the visitation of tombs of the Imams. He considered many of these practices as bid‘ah (innovations) that had no basis in the early Islamic tradition and that promoted superstition and division among Muslims.

For Ibn Taymiyyah, tawhid (the oneness of God) was a fundamental pillar that he believed was compromised by excessive veneration of religious figures—even revered Imams like Ali, Hussain, or Ja‘far al-Sadiq.

Tone and Purpose of His Critique

It is important to note that while Ibn Taymiyyah’s tone is often polemical and harsh, particularly in Minhāj al-Sunnah, his goal was not merely to insult but to defend what he saw as authentic Islam. He believed that Shiism had introduced foreign elements into Islam, influenced by Persian, philosophical, and sometimes even heretical sources. He saw his work as a religious and intellectual defense of Sunni orthodoxy.

That said, his writings have been used—sometimes selectively—by later polemicists and extremist groups to justify sectarian hostility. Modern scholars caution that while Ibn Taymiyyah was undoubtedly critical of Shiite doctrines, his views must be situated within the intellectual and political context of his time rather than used to fuel contemporary conflicts.

Modern Legacy and Controversy

Ibn Taymiyyah’s critique of Shiism has had a long afterlife. His works were revived and popularized by later Islamic reformers such as Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab, and have influenced Salafi interpretations of Islam. His rejection of Shiite theology has been cited in both scholarly debates and sectarian polemics, particularly in regions where Sunni-Shiite tensions are high.

However, many modern scholars, both Sunni and Shiite, have called for greater inter-sectarian understanding and a more nuanced reading of historical figures like Ibn Taymiyyah. While he remains a deeply respected figure in Sunni thought, there is recognition that repeating medieval polemics in the modern age without context can exacerbate division rather than promote clarity or reform.

Conclusion: A Contested Legacy

Ibn Taymiyyah’s writings on Shiites reflect his deep commitment to what he saw as the purity and unity of Islamic belief and practice. His critiques were grounded in theological and historical arguments and shaped by the socio-political pressures of his time. While his works remain influential and are studied widely across the Muslim world, they also continue to spark debate—both for their intellectual rigor and for their role in sectarian discourse.

To truly understand Ibn Taymiyyah’s legacy on this subject is to engage not only with his criticisms but also with the historical forces that drove them—and to reflect on how those ideas are interpreted today.

Ibn Hazm Al-Andalusi and His View of Shiites as Non-Muslims

Ibn Hazm al-Andalusi (994–1064 CE), a prominent Andalusian Muslim scholar, is a significant figure in Islamic thought. Known for his contributions to jurisprudence (fiqh), theology (kalam), and hadith studies, Ibn Hazm’s work has been influential across many areas of Islamic scholarship. One of his more controversial stances was his opinion on the Shi'a sect within Islam, specifically his assertion that Shiites, or the followers of the Shi’a branch of Islam, were not true Muslims. This view, which he articulated in his works, particularly Al-Fisal fi al-Milal wa al-Ahwa’ wa al-Nihal (The Book of the Division of the Sects, Opinions, and Heresies), has sparked intense debates among scholars and remains a point of contention in the history of Islamic thought.

Ibn Hazm’s arguments regarding the Shi'a are rooted in his interpretation of Islamic orthodoxy and his strict approach to religious practices and beliefs. To understand why he considered Shiites to be outside the fold of Islam, it is essential to explore the historical context, his theological methodology, and his reasoning behind such a contentious stance.

The Historical Context of Ibn Hazm’s Era

Ibn Hazm lived during a period of significant political and theological fragmentation within the Islamic world. Spain, or Al-Andalus, where he was based, was under the rule of the Umayyads, a dynasty that had seen its power wane and was eventually replaced by smaller taifa kingdoms. The broader Muslim world was also experiencing major divisions, particularly between the Sunni and Shi’a sects.

The Shi'a and Sunni split has its origins in the early history of Islam, beginning with the dispute over the rightful successor to the Prophet Muhammad after his death in 632 CE. Sunni Muslims believe that the Prophet’s companion, Abu Bakr, was the rightful successor, whereas Shi'a Muslims argue that leadership should have passed to Ali ibn Abi Talib, the Prophet’s cousin and son-in-law. This theological and political disagreement led to the formation of two distinct sects, with Shi’a Islam emphasizing the unique authority of the Prophet’s family, known as the Ahl al-Bayt, and their role in interpreting the divine law.

By Ibn Hazm’s time, the divide between Sunni and Shi’a had deepened, and various sects within both Sunni and Shi’a communities had emerged. In Al-Andalus, Sunni orthodoxy was dominant, and Shi’a communities were often seen as heretical or even subversive by some Sunni scholars. This division was not just a theological dispute; it also had political ramifications, with the Shi’a often associated with rival dynasties or movements that challenged Sunni authority.

Ibn Hazm’s Methodology: Literalism and Textual Authority

Ibn Hazm is often regarded as one of the most prominent proponents of the Zahiri school of Islamic jurisprudence, which advocates for a literal and strict interpretation of the Qur'an and Hadith (the sayings and actions of the Prophet Muhammad). Unlike other Sunni schools of thought, the Zahiri school rejects the use of qiyas (analogy) and istihsan (juridical preference) in favor of a more literalist approach to Islamic law.

Ibn Hazm’s textual literalism extended to his understanding of Islamic creed (aqeedah) as well. He believed that the most reliable way to understand Islam was to adhere closely to the texts of the Qur'an and Hadith, while rejecting any innovations (bid'ah) that were not explicitly supported by these sources. This approach led him to take a hardline stance on many theological issues, including the legitimacy of Shi’a beliefs.

In his work Al-Fisal, Ibn Hazm categorizes different sects and heresies that emerged in the Islamic world, and he devotes significant attention to the Shi’a. He criticized their beliefs, accusing them of distorting the true teachings of Islam, and argued that their views were not in accordance with the Qur'an and Hadith. In his view, the Shi’a made several theological innovations that placed them outside the boundaries of Islam as defined by the Qur'an and the Sunnah (the way of the Prophet).

Ibn Hazm’s Critique of Shi’ism

One of Ibn Hazm’s main criticisms of the Shi’a was their belief in the divine appointment of Ali and his descendants as the rightful leaders of the Muslim community. The Shi’a claim that the Prophet Muhammad explicitly designated Ali as his successor at Ghadir Khumm, a controversial event that is interpreted differently by Sunnis and Shi’as. Ibn Hazm rejected this interpretation, arguing that there was no clear textual evidence from the Qur'an or Hadith to support the idea that the Prophet Muhammad intended Ali to be his successor. According to Ibn Hazm, such beliefs were a clear deviation from the Qur'an and the Sunnah, and therefore, he saw them as an innovation that invalidated the Shi’a as true Muslims.

Furthermore, Ibn Hazm disagreed with the Shi’a view of the Ahl al-Bayt (the family of the Prophet). The Shi’a emphasize the special, divinely ordained status of the Prophet’s family, particularly Ali, his wife Fatimah, and their descendants. Ibn Hazm, however, did not accept this elevation of the Ahl al-Bayt and believed that such beliefs were an exaggeration. For Ibn Hazm, the Qur'an does not grant any special, exclusive status to the family of the Prophet, and he considered the Shi’a veneration of the Ahl al-Bayt to be a form of innovation and deviation from true Islamic practice.

Ibn Hazm also criticized the Shi’a’s belief in the concept of Imamate, which holds that the Imam, or leader, must be divinely appointed and infallible. The Shi’a believe that the Imam is not just a political leader but also a religious guide who has the authority to interpret the Qur'an and Hadith. Ibn Hazm rejected the idea of an infallible Imam, arguing that it was incompatible with the teachings of Islam. He emphasized the principle that no human being, regardless of their lineage or status, could possess such infallibility. In his view, the notion of an infallible Imam was an innovation that had no basis in the Qur'an or the Sunnah.

Ibn Hazm’s Conclusion: Shiites as Non-Muslims

In light of his theological criticisms, Ibn Hazm concluded that the Shi’a were not true Muslims. He argued that their beliefs diverged so significantly from the orthodox Sunni understanding of Islam that they could not be considered part of the same religious community. According to Ibn Hazm, the Shi’a had introduced heretical ideas that were contrary to the teachings of the Qur'an and the Sunnah, and thus, they were outside the fold of Islam.

Ibn Hazm’s position was not universally accepted by all Sunni scholars. While his views on the Shi’a were harsh, other scholars, including those from the Ash'ari and Maturidi schools of Sunni theology, were more open to recognizing the Shi’a as fellow Muslims, despite their theological differences. In the centuries following Ibn Hazm’s death, debates over the status of the Shi’a continued, with some scholars adopting a more ecumenical approach, while others maintained a hardline stance similar to Ibn Hazm’s.

The Legacy of Ibn Hazm’s View on Shiism

Ibn Hazm’s view of the Shi’a as non-Muslims remains a subject of significant debate in Islamic scholarship. His strict interpretation of Islamic orthodoxy has influenced many Sunni scholars, particularly those who adhere to the Zahiri school. However, his views also sparked counter-arguments from scholars who advocated for a more inclusive approach to the diverse sects within Islam.

The question of whether the Shi’a are considered non-Muslim is still a point of contention in some Islamic communities, especially in the modern political context. In some parts of the Muslim world, particularly in Sunni-majority countries, Ibn Hazm’s harsh critique of the Shi’a has had lasting repercussions, contributing to sectarian tensions. However, in other parts of the world, particularly in Shi’a-majority countries such as Iran, the theological and political divide remains significant, but the idea of excluding the Shi’a from the broader Muslim community has become less common.

Conclusion

Ibn Hazm al-Andalusi’s view that Shiites were not true Muslims reflects his strict interpretation of Islamic orthodoxy and his commitment to a literalist reading of the Qur'an and Hadith. His criticism of Shi’a beliefs, particularly regarding the Imamate, the Ahl al-Bayt, and the succession of Ali, marked a major point of theological divergence between Sunni and Shi’a Islam. While his views have been influential in certain Sunni circles, they also sparked significant debate and remain a contentious issue in Islamic theology. Understanding Ibn Hazm’s position on the Shi’a provides important insight into the historical and theological divisions within Islam, divisions that continue to shape the Muslim world today.