Who was Ayatollah Montazeri?

Introduction

Ayatollah Hossein Ali Montazeri was one of the most influential and controversial figures in modern Iranian history. A leading Shi'a scholar, he played a key role in shaping the ideology of the Islamic Republic of Iran but later became one of its fiercest critics. Montazeri's life reflects the complexities of Iran’s political and religious landscape, as he transitioned from being a close ally of Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini to a vocal dissident advocating for democracy and human rights. This article explores Montazeri’s early life, his rise to prominence, his fall from power, and his enduring legacy.

Early Life and Religious Education

Born in 1922 in Najafabad, a town in the central Iranian province of Isfahan, Hossein Ali Montazeri grew up in a devout family. From an early age, he displayed a keen interest in Islamic studies, and he eventually moved to the religious city of Qom, where he studied under some of the most prominent clerics of the time, including Ayatollah Khomeini.

Montazeri quickly gained recognition as a brilliant student of Islamic jurisprudence, earning the title of Grand Ayatollah. His association with Khomeini during the 1960s and 1970s positioned him as a leading voice in the struggle against the Shah’s regime, which was widely seen as oppressive and aligned with Western interests.

Role in the Iranian Revolution

Montazeri was a crucial figure in the 1979 Iranian Revolution that led to the overthrow of Mohammad Reza Shah Pahlavi and the establishment of the Islamic Republic. He was one of Khomeini’s closest confidants and played an instrumental role in drafting the new constitution, which enshrined the principle of Velayat-e Faqih (Guardianship of the Jurist). This doctrine granted ultimate authority to a supreme religious leader—a position that Khomeini would assume.

As a reward for his loyalty and intellectual contributions, Montazeri was designated as Khomeini’s successor in 1985, positioning him as the future Supreme Leader of Iran. At that time, he was considered one of the most powerful clerics in the country.

Fall from Power

Despite his prominence, Montazeri’s relationship with Khomeini and the ruling establishment deteriorated in the late 1980s. He became increasingly critical of human rights abuses, particularly the mass executions of political prisoners in 1988. His outspoken opposition to these executions placed him at odds with Khomeini and the hardliners within the government.

In March 1989, just months before Khomeini’s death, Montazeri was officially removed as the designated successor. His criticisms of government policies, including his belief that the Islamic Republic was straying from its original revolutionary ideals, led to his marginalization. After Khomeini’s death, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei was chosen as Supreme Leader instead, despite having significantly less religious authority than Montazeri.

Years of Dissent and House Arrest

Following his removal from power, Montazeri continued to be an outspoken critic of the Iranian government. He consistently advocated for greater political freedoms, respect for human rights, and a less repressive interpretation of Islamic governance. His public statements and writings challenged the legitimacy of the Supreme Leader’s absolute authority.

As a result of his defiance, Montazeri was placed under house arrest in 1997, a confinement that lasted until 2003. Even after his release, he remained an influential dissident voice, especially during the 2009 Green Movement, which emerged in response to disputed presidential elections. His criticisms of the government’s repression of protesters further cemented his status as a symbol of resistance within Iran.

Legacy and Influence

Ayatollah Montazeri passed away on December 19, 2009, at the age of 87. His funeral in Qom was attended by thousands of supporters, turning into a demonstration against the Iranian government. Despite his official marginalization, Montazeri’s teachings and writings continue to inspire reformists and advocates for democracy within Iran and among the Iranian diaspora.

His legacy remains complex: while he was instrumental in establishing the Islamic Republic, he later became its most prominent critic. His advocacy for a more just and humane interpretation of Islamic governance challenges the authoritarian structure of Iran’s current political system. As such, Montazeri is remembered as both an architect of the revolution and a symbol of its betrayed ideals.

Conclusion

Ayatollah Hossein Ali Montazeri’s life was marked by paradoxes. He was a revolutionary who helped create the Islamic Republic but later denounced its leadership for deviating from Islamic justice and human rights. His courage to stand against oppression, even at great personal cost, solidified his legacy as one of Iran’s most significant and enduring voices for reform. Though he never saw the democratic changes he envisioned, his ideas continue to resonate with those seeking a more open and just Iran.

Who is Ayatollah Al-Sistani?

Ayatollah Sayyid Ali al-Husseini al-Sistani is one of the most influential and revered figures in contemporary Shia Islam and the Islamic world at large. Born on August 4, 1930, in Mashhad, Iran, he has served as the preeminent Grand Ayatollah of Najaf, Iraq, since the late 20th century. His life, teachings, and political influence have profoundly shaped Shia theology, Iraqi politics, and global Islamic thought. This article delves into his early life, religious education, rise to prominence, and his pivotal role in Iraq and beyond.

---

Early Life and Education

Ali al-Sistani was born into a devout Shia Muslim family in Mashhad, a city known for the shrine of Imam Reza, the eighth Shia Imam. His family traces its lineage back to the Prophet Muhammad through Imam Musa al-Kadhim, the seventh Shia Imam. This noble lineage earned the family the title "Sayyid."

From a young age, Sistani displayed a remarkable aptitude for religious studies. He began his education in Mashhad, studying under prominent scholars and mastering foundational Islamic sciences such as Quranic interpretation, jurisprudence (fiqh), and theology (‘aqidah). In 1949, at the age of 19, he moved to Qom, Iran, to further his studies under the tutelage of Ayatollah Hossein Borujerdi, one of the leading Shia scholars of the time.

In 1951, Sistani relocated to Najaf, Iraq, a city that holds immense significance for Shia Muslims as the burial place of Imam Ali ibn Abi Talib, the first Shia Imam and cousin of the Prophet Muhammad. There, he studied under the renowned Grand Ayatollah Abu al-Qasim al-Khoei, whose intellectual and spiritual influence profoundly shaped Sistani’s scholarly development. Sistani excelled in his studies and quickly rose through the ranks of the hawza (Shia seminary).

---

Rise to Prominence

After the death of Ayatollah al-Khoei in 1992, Sistani emerged as his natural successor, becoming the Grand Ayatollah of Najaf and the spiritual leader of millions of Shia Muslims worldwide. As a marja‘ al-taqlid (source of emulation), Sistani holds the highest authority in Shia jurisprudence. His followers look to him for guidance on religious, social, and even political matters.

Sistani’s leadership style is characterized by pragmatism, a focus on traditional Shia values, and a preference for quiet diplomacy over overt political engagement. Unlike Iran’s Ayatollah Khomeini, who advocated for the direct rule of clergy through the concept of Wilayat al-Faqih (Guardianship of the Jurist), Sistani believes in a more limited role for religious authorities in governance. He advocates for a system where clerics provide moral and ethical guidance while leaving the day-to-day administration to elected officials.

---

Role in Post-2003 Iraq

The U.S.-led invasion of Iraq in 2003 marked a turning point for Ayatollah Sistani’s role in global politics. As Iraq descended into chaos following the fall of Saddam Hussein’s regime, Sistani emerged as a stabilizing force. His calls for unity, patience, and peaceful resistance played a crucial role in preventing widespread sectarian violence.

Key Contributions:

1. Drafting the Iraqi Constitution: Sistani insisted on an inclusive, democratic process for drafting Iraq’s new constitution. He urged Shia leaders to participate in elections and pushed for the establishment of a parliamentary system.

2. Opposition to Sectarianism: During the height of Sunni-Shia tensions, Sistani consistently condemned violence and called for coexistence. His fatwas emphasized the sanctity of all Muslim lives, regardless of sectarian affiliation.

3. Mobilizing Against ISIS: In 2014, when the Islamic State (ISIS) overran large parts of Iraq, Sistani issued a historic fatwa calling on Iraqis to take up arms to defend their country. This led to the formation of the Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF), a coalition of militias that played a key role in defeating ISIS.

---

Theological Contributions

As a scholar, Sistani has made significant contributions to Shia jurisprudence and theology. His works cover a wide range of topics, from the principles of Islamic jurisprudence (usul al-fiqh) to social ethics and contemporary issues. His rulings emphasize moderation, adaptability, and the importance of context in applying Islamic law.

One of his notable contributions is his focus on the concept of "maslahat" (public interest). Sistani argues that Islamic rulings should prioritize the welfare of the community and adapt to changing circumstances. This approach has allowed him to address modern challenges while remaining rooted in traditional Shia teachings.

---

Humanitarian Efforts

Sistani’s influence extends beyond religious and political realms. He is deeply committed to humanitarian causes, using his vast network of followers and financial resources to support the poor and vulnerable. His office funds numerous charitable projects, including schools, hospitals, and orphanages, across Iraq and other Shia-majority regions.

During crises such as the displacement of millions of Iraqis by ISIS, Sistani’s charitable initiatives provided vital assistance, including food, shelter, and medical care. His humanitarian efforts have earned him respect not only among Shia Muslims but also from people of other faiths and communities.

---

Controversies and Criticisms

Despite his widespread acclaim, Ayatollah Sistani has faced criticism from various quarters. Some hardline Shia groups accuse him of being too passive in the face of injustices, while Sunni extremists view him as a divisive figure. Additionally, his refusal to endorse the concept of Wilayat al-Faqih has drawn criticism from pro-Iranian factions within the Shia community.

Nevertheless, Sistani’s commitment to peace and his rejection of sectarianism have helped him maintain his status as a unifying figure in Iraq and the broader Islamic world.

---

Legacy and Global Impact

Ayatollah Sistani’s influence extends far beyond Iraq. As the leader of the Najaf seminary, he serves as a spiritual guide for millions of Shia Muslims worldwide. His teachings have shaped the theological landscape of Shia Islam and provided a counterbalance to the more politicized approach of Iran’s religious establishment.

In 2021, Sistani met with Pope Francis in a historic interfaith dialogue that underscored his commitment to fostering understanding and cooperation between religions. The meeting, held in Najaf, highlighted Sistani’s role as a global advocate for peace and coexistence.

---

Conclusion

Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani is a towering figure in the modern Islamic world. His life and work embody the principles of wisdom, compassion, and steadfastness in the face of adversity. Through his scholarship, leadership, and humanitarian efforts, he has left an indelible mark on Shia Islam and global politics. As Iraq and the broader Middle East navigate complex challenges, Sistani’s teachings and example continue to serve as a beacon of hope and guidance for millions.

The Mirage in Iran by Ahmad Al-Afghani

Introduction

"The Mirage in Iran" (originally titled "Sarab fee Iran") is a seminal work by Dr. Ahmad al-Afghani, first published in 1982. The book was later translated into English by Dr. Abu Ameenah Bilal Philips, making its critical perspectives accessible to a broader audience. This work delves into the historical and theological roles of the Shiite sect within the Islamic world, offering a Sunni viewpoint on Shiite doctrines and their implications.

Historical Context

Dr. al-Afghani's analysis is rooted in a historical examination of the Shiite sect's emergence and evolution. He discusses pivotal events, such as the succession disputes following Prophet Muhammad's death, which led to the Sunni-Shiite schism. The author contends that throughout Islamic history, certain Shiite factions have engaged in actions detrimental to the unity and stability of the Muslim Ummah. By highlighting these events, Dr. al-Afghani aims to underscore the complexities and challenges posed by sectarian divisions within Islam.

Theological Critique

Central to "The Mirage in Iran" is a critique of Shiite theological doctrines. Dr. al-Afghani examines beliefs such as the infallibility of the Imams, the concept of Taqiyyah (religious dissimulation), and the practice of temporary marriage (Mut'ah). He argues that these doctrines diverge from mainstream Sunni interpretations of Islam. For instance, the attribution of infallibility to Imams is seen as conflicting with the Sunni emphasis on the finality and completeness of Prophet Muhammad's prophethood. By dissecting these theological differences, the author seeks to highlight what he perceives as deviations from orthodox Islamic teachings.

Shiite Influence in Iran

The book pays particular attention to Iran, especially in the context of the 1979 Islamic Revolution led by Ayatollah Khomeini. Dr. al-Afghani discusses how Shiite ideology became intertwined with the state's political framework, leading to the establishment of a theocratic regime. He expresses concerns about the exportation of this revolutionary Shiite ideology to other parts of the Muslim world, viewing it as a potential source of discord and division among Muslim communities. The author warns against the politicization of religious beliefs, suggesting that it can lead to authoritarianism and sectarian strife.

Scholarly Perspectives

Dr. al-Afghani references both classical and contemporary Sunni scholars to support his critiques of Shiite doctrines. He cites historical fatwas and writings that have addressed the Sunni stance on Shiite beliefs and practices. By doing so, he situates his arguments within a broader scholarly tradition, aiming to provide a comprehensive Sunni perspective on the issues at hand. This approach lends weight to his critiques, as it aligns them with established scholarly opinions and interpretations.

Contemporary Relevance

While "The Mirage in Iran" was written in the early 1980s, its themes remain pertinent today. The Sunni-Shiite divide continues to influence geopolitical dynamics in the Middle East and beyond. Dr. al-Afghani's work serves as a reminder of the importance of intra-faith dialogue and understanding. By critically examining doctrinal differences, the book encourages readers to engage in informed discussions aimed at fostering unity and mutual respect among Muslims. In an era where sectarian conflicts persist, such scholarly contributions are invaluable for promoting peace and cohesion within the global Muslim community.

Conclusion

"The Mirage in Iran" by Dr. Ahmad al-Afghani offers a critical Sunni perspective on Shiite history and theology. Through meticulous analysis, the author highlights the complexities and challenges posed by sectarian divisions within Islam. The book serves as both a historical account and a theological critique, urging readers to reflect on the implications of doctrinal differences for the unity of the Muslim Ummah. As such, it remains a significant contribution to Islamic scholarship and a valuable resource for those seeking to understand the nuances of Sunni-Shiite relations.

Shia Islam Existed Initially to Support Calipah Ali Before Many of Ali's Supporters Became Kharijites

The origins of Shia Islam are deeply intertwined with the early political and theological struggles that emerged in the wake of the Prophet Muhammad’s death in 632 CE. Central to these struggles was the contentious question of leadership and rightful succession in the nascent Muslim community. While Shia Islam eventually evolved into a distinct branch of Islam with its own rich theological and legal traditions, its roots lie in the political movement that coalesced around Ali ibn Abi Talib, the cousin and son-in-law of the Prophet. This article explores how Shia Islam initially emerged to support Ali's claim to leadership and how this movement faced fragmentation, giving rise to groups such as the Kharijites.

The Context of Succession Disputes

Upon the death of Prophet Muhammad, the Muslim community faced the pressing issue of leadership. The Prophet had not left explicit instructions regarding his successor, leading to disagreements among his followers. While a majority of Muslims accepted Abu Bakr, a close companion of the Prophet, as the first caliph, a faction believed that Ali, as a member of the Prophet’s family and a man of exceptional piety and knowledge, was the rightful leader. This faction emphasized Ali’s close kinship with the Prophet and his spiritual qualities, laying the groundwork for what would later develop into Shia Islam.

This initial support for Ali, however, did not yet constitute a formal religious sect. Rather, it was a political movement advocating for what its adherents saw as the just and rightful leadership of the Muslim community. During the caliphates of Abu Bakr, Umar, and Uthman, Ali’s supporters remained relatively quiet, though they harbored grievances over what they perceived as the marginalization of the Prophet’s family.

Ali’s Caliphate and the Emergence of Factionalism

Ali’s ascension to the caliphate in 656 CE, following the assassination of the third caliph, Uthman, marked a pivotal moment. Ali’s rule was immediately contested by powerful figures, including Aisha (the Prophet’s widow) and Muawiya, the governor of Syria and a relative of Uthman. These disputes led to a series of civil wars known as the First Fitna (Islamic civil war).

Ali’s supporters, who rallied around his cause during this turbulent period, began to articulate arguments for his leadership based on both political and religious principles. They viewed Ali as the most qualified leader due to his proximity to the Prophet, his deep knowledge of Islam, and his moral integrity. These principles would later form the basis of Shia theology, particularly the belief in the imamate—the idea that legitimate leaders must be divinely chosen and possess both spiritual and temporal authority.

The Rise of the Kharijites

One of the most significant challenges to Ali’s leadership came not from his external enemies but from within his own camp. The turning point was the Battle of Siffin (657 CE), where Ali’s forces clashed with those of Muawiya. The battle ended in a stalemate, and both sides agreed to arbitration to resolve the conflict. This decision angered a faction of Ali’s supporters, who believed that arbitration was tantamount to subordinating divine judgment to human decision-making.

These dissenters, known as the Kharijites (from the Arabic “khawarij,” meaning “those who go out”), broke away from Ali’s camp. They argued that leadership should not be based on lineage or tribal affiliation but on piety and adherence to Islamic principles. The Kharijites declared that anyone who committed a major sin or failed to uphold divine law was unfit to rule, regardless of their status. This radical egalitarianism set them apart not only from Ali’s followers but also from the emerging Sunni majority.

The Kharijites’ rebellion culminated in a series of violent confrontations with Ali’s forces. While Ali managed to suppress their uprisings temporarily, the Kharijites’ assassination of Ali in 661 CE marked a tragic end to his caliphate and further fragmented the Muslim community.

The Development of Shia Identity

With Ali’s death, his supporters faced a crisis of leadership. Many transferred their allegiance to his sons, Hasan and later Husayn, whom they regarded as the rightful heirs to Ali’s legacy. This dynastic focus became a defining feature of Shia Islam, which holds that leadership must remain within the Prophet’s family, specifically through Ali and his descendants.

The tragedy of Karbala in 680 CE, where Husayn and his followers were martyred by the forces of the Umayyad caliph Yazid, became a central event in Shia consciousness. The memory of Karbala solidified the Shia identity as a community of resistance against injustice and tyranny. It also deepened the theological divide between Shia and Sunni Islam, as Shia Muslims began to emphasize themes of martyrdom, divine justice, and the redemptive suffering of the imams.

Theological Divergences

While the early Shia movement was primarily political, it gradually developed distinct theological doctrines. Central to Shia belief is the concept of the imamate, which holds that imams are divinely appointed leaders endowed with special knowledge (‘ilm) and spiritual authority. This contrasts with Sunni Islam, which emphasizes the consensus (‘ijma’) of the community and the qualifications of leaders based on their ability to govern effectively and uphold Islamic law.

The Kharijites, in contrast, rejected the notion of hereditary leadership altogether. They insisted that any Muslim, regardless of lineage, could become a leader if they demonstrated piety and adherence to Islamic principles. This strict meritocracy and their uncompromising stance on sin and governance alienated them from both Sunni and Shia Muslims, leading to their marginalization in Islamic history.

Legacy and Impact

The early struggles over Ali’s leadership and the subsequent fragmentation of his supporters had profound implications for Islamic history. The Shia and Kharijite movements, though originating from a shared allegiance to Ali, took radically different paths. While the Shia developed into a major branch of Islam with a sophisticated theological and legal tradition, the Kharijites remained a fringe group, often associated with militancy and radicalism.

The legacy of these early divisions continues to shape the Muslim world. For Shia Muslims, Ali represents the epitome of just and divinely guided leadership, and his memory is celebrated with reverence. The Kharijites, though largely a historical phenomenon, serve as a cautionary tale about the dangers of extremism and schism.

Conclusion

Shia Islam’s origins as a political movement supporting Ali ibn Abi Talib highlight the complex interplay between politics and religion in early Islamic history. While initially united in their advocacy for Ali, his supporters faced internal divisions that gave rise to the Kharijites and other factions. These divisions underscore the diversity of thought and the contested nature of authority in the early Muslim community. Over time, the Shia developed a distinct identity centered on the imamate and the legacy of Ali and his family, while the Kharijites left an indelible mark as early advocates of egalitarian and uncompromising principles of leadership. Together, these movements illustrate the enduring impact of the early struggles over leadership and legitimacy in shaping the Islamic tradition.

Ayatollah Khomeini and His Agenda to Dominate All Muslim Countries

The Iranian Revolution of 1979, led by Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, marked a profound shift in the political and religious landscape of the Middle East. Khomeini, a Shiite cleric, managed to overthrow the Pahlavi monarchy in Iran and establish the Islamic Republic of Iran, fundamentally altering the region's dynamics. However, his ambitions extended far beyond merely governing Iran. Khomeini sought to reshape the Muslim world according to his vision of Islamic governance, and in doing so, he articulated an agenda that aimed to dominate not only Iran but also influence and, in some cases, control other Muslim countries. This article explores Khomeini's ideological foundations, his strategies for advancing his vision, and the impact of his actions on the wider Muslim world.

The Rise of Khomeini

Born in 1902 in the town of Khomein, Iran, Ruhollah Khomeini was raised in a family of clerics. He became an influential religious scholar and was known for his sharp critiques of the Pahlavi regime, which he saw as corrupt, Westernized, and oppressive to Islam. Khomeini’s ideology combined traditional Shiite teachings with a more radical, politicized view of Islam. He argued that Islam was not just a set of religious principles but also a comprehensive political system that should govern all aspects of life. His most significant contribution to Islamic political thought was the concept of Wilayat al-Faqih (Guardianship of the Islamic Jurist), which he argued justified the rule of a leading Islamic scholar over the state.

Khomeini’s views placed him in direct opposition to the secular nature of the Pahlavi monarchy. After leading a campaign of protests, strikes, and civil disobedience, Khomeini succeeded in toppling the Shah in February 1979, returning to Iran from exile and assuming control of the country. His vision was clear: an Iran governed by Islamic law, with clerical authority at its helm.

Khomeini’s Vision for an Islamic World

Khomeini’s vision was not limited to the borders of Iran. He was determined to spread his radical interpretation of Islam throughout the Muslim world, particularly to countries with significant Shiite populations. At the heart of his agenda was the idea of an Islamic resurgence—a movement to restore Islam’s political dominance in a world where, according to Khomeini, it had been overshadowed by Western imperialism and secularism.

Khomeini’s ultimate goal was to unite all Muslim countries under a single, Islamic framework, governed by Islamic law (Sharia), and under the leadership of Islamic scholars who would embody the principles of Wilayat al-Faqih. He believed that Islamic unity could only be achieved through the removal of foreign influences and the overthrow of secular regimes that were allied with the West. This vision of Islamic unity was ideological, but it was also political and practical, based on his understanding of Islam as both a spiritual and temporal power.

The Strategy for Domination: Revolutionary Export

One of Khomeini’s most significant strategies for achieving his goal of Muslim domination was the export of the Iranian Revolution. Iran, under Khomeini’s leadership, would serve as a model for other Muslim nations. He envisioned Iran as the leader of a global Islamic movement, and he encouraged other nations to adopt a political system based on Wilayat al-Faqih. Khomeini’s rhetoric was not just theoretical but also deeply practical. He sought to create alliances with other revolutionary movements, especially those in Shiite-majority countries such as Iraq, Lebanon, and Bahrain.

The Islamic Revolution in Iran provided Khomeini with the opportunity to send his message abroad, and he used the country’s new political and diplomatic influence to fund and support insurgencies in countries he believed could be transformed into Islamic republics. One of the most significant efforts in this regard was the establishment of Hezbollah in Lebanon in the early 1980s. Hezbollah, an Iran-backed Shiite militant group, became a powerful force in Lebanon and was a manifestation of Khomeini’s vision of exporting revolution through support for armed struggle.

Khomeini also attempted to infiltrate other countries through more subtle means. He used Iran’s wealth, gained largely through oil exports, to fund religious schools and charities in places like Pakistan, Afghanistan, and the Gulf states, which would spread his ideological agenda and foster a generation of radical clerics. This strategy aimed not just at spreading religious influence but also at creating networks of loyalists who could challenge secular governments and promote Khomeini’s political goals.

Challenges to Khomeini’s Vision

While Khomeini was a charismatic leader with a grand vision for the Muslim world, his agenda faced significant challenges. Not all Muslims accepted his version of Islam or his political authority. The Sunni-Shia divide, which has been a source of tension in the Islamic world for centuries, was one of the greatest obstacles to Khomeini’s agenda.

In Sunni-majority countries like Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and Pakistan, Khomeini’s ideology was seen as a threat to the established order. These countries were skeptical of his claims to Islamic leadership, and Khomeini’s efforts to subvert their political systems were met with resistance. For instance, the Iranian Revolution inspired some Shiite communities in countries like Iraq and Bahrain, but it was also seen as a destabilizing force by Sunni-majority governments. Khomeini’s efforts to export his revolution also led to tensions with the West and with other Muslim nations, many of whom viewed Iran as a destabilizing influence in the region.

In Iraq, for example, Khomeini’s call for Shiite revolutionaries to rise against the secular Ba’athist regime was not well received. Iraq’s dictator, Saddam Hussein, saw Khomeini’s influence as a direct threat and responded by launching the Iran-Iraq War in 1980. This brutal conflict lasted for eight years and resulted in heavy casualties on both sides but failed to achieve Khomeini’s ultimate goal of spreading the revolution.

Additionally, Khomeini’s reliance on militant proxies and revolutionary methods led to widespread instability in the region. His support for Hezbollah in Lebanon, while successful in the short term, contributed to long-term regional conflict, and his efforts to spread his ideology also fueled sectarian violence in places like Iraq, where tensions between Sunni and Shiite groups have persisted.

Legacy and Impact on the Muslim World

Although Khomeini’s efforts to dominate all Muslim countries met with limited success, his influence on the Muslim world cannot be understated. His idea of Wilayat al-Faqih remains central to Iranian politics, with the position of Supreme Leader continuing to wield immense power. Khomeini’s revolution also sparked the rise of political Islam as a global force, inspiring movements such as the Islamic Salvation Front in Algeria, the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood, and the Taliban in Afghanistan. These groups, however, have often diverged from Khomeini’s vision, reflecting the diversity of Islamic political thought.

In many ways, Khomeini’s legacy is one of polarization and division. While some Shiite communities continue to revere him as a visionary leader, many Sunni-majority countries view his legacy with suspicion and fear. The geopolitical tensions that emerged from his revolutionary agenda continue to shape the politics of the Middle East today.

Khomeini’s attempts to dominate the Muslim world through his revolutionary ideals and the export of the Iranian revolution were, in many ways, a precursor to the broader ideological and sectarian conflicts that would characterize much of the late 20th and early 21st centuries. His vision of an Islamic world governed by religious scholars remains a powerful force in Iran, but it has also contributed to ongoing conflicts and power struggles in the wider Muslim world.

Conclusion

Ayatollah Khomeini’s ambition to dominate all Muslim countries was driven by a deep belief in the superiority of his vision for Islamic governance. While his efforts to export revolution met with mixed results, the political and ideological impact of his ideas continues to resonate across the Middle East and beyond. His legacy is one of religious and political upheaval, and his vision of an Islamic world united under the banner of Wilayat al-Faqih remains a point of contention within Islam to this day.